nude,art,pornography,shop,museum,registration,indiana,law,debate,classic Nude Art or Pornography
posted by
LadyDeath
3 months 3 weeks ago •
4352 viewstags:
nude, art, pornography, shop, museum, registration, indiana, law, debate, classic
Museum fights law that says it should be classified as a sex shop.
Comments

playlists with this video
Sociological Issues by
Constitutional_Patriot
•
Art by
Constitutional_Patriot
•
Conversation, Anyone? by
karkarlee
•
Nerdy by
karkarlee
who voted for this video
LadyDeath
-
Zonbie
-
rbar
-
Constitutional_Patriot
-
Abducted
-
nickreal03
-
Majortomyorke
-
NordlichReiter
-
mintbbb
-
Bidouleroux
-
NetRunner
-
chilaxe
-
rasch187
-
Pushkill
-
kronosposeidon
-
Bullard
-
pierrekrahn
-
Lendl
-
deputydog
-
rubadub
- vermonter
- tmcdermid
- tagomi77
- Lumm
- spoco2
- dotdude
- Sketch
- RedSky
- dystopianfuturetoday
- MarineGunrock
- gwiz665
- MrConrads
- Farhad2000
- smiley
- frogger3d
- legacy0100
- White
- crotchflame
- Jordass
- Crosswords
- mj0lnir
- Sagemind
- neuralnoise
- Thylan
- rottenseed
- kulpims
- Issykitty
- blutruth
- Pooterius
- BoneyD
- brycewi19
- DavidRaine
- jwray
- blankfist
- poolcleaner
- pho3n1x
- LittleRed
- Norsuelefantti
- daxgaz
- omnistegan
- xxovercastxx
- steroidg
- gemini70
- cheesemoo
- Shepppard
- ZombieGuerilla
- nibiyabi
- dag
- ZuroS
- jonb42
- Spoon_Gouge
- Plonq
- Tymbrwulf
- eric3579
- howie448
- balabing
- samnmax
- karkarlee
- bamdrew
- lavoll
who voted against this video
Ryjkyj
who has this playlist bookmarked
Mixaster
-
poolcleaner
-
legacy0100
Nude Art Or Pornography Related Videos
it's art. in fact, forget that. it's the human body. the longer we let fuddy-duddies censor depictions of the naked form, the longer we have problems.
i'll be showing my kids (if i ever have any) artistic recreations of the human body as soon as i can. let's stop being so fucking prudish about the skin we live in. as the last guy says, "it's absurd".
>> ^westy:
well [insert coma here] i see nothing wrong with nudity evan sex for kids to look at as its perfectly human and normal . but [began the sentence with a lower case "B" and a conjunction] if you [Insert "are"] going to make it [Poor sentence structure. Specify subject "it"] 18+ to see people having sex ore to look at porn then it folows that same should aply to art that depicts the same things, it [What is it?] only servs to highlight the obserdity of the law and how stupid hamans can be
[Long run-on sentence with improper punctuation]
Stop treating the human body as ANYTHING to be ashamed of. NUDITY should NEVER be considered obscene. NUDITY in and of itself, the showing of the body IS NOT and SHOULD NOT be treated as wrong in any way.
You can DO things with naked bodies that can be considered obscene. If you strip off in the middle of a mall and have sex, that's inappropriate, there's a time and a place for that, and I wouldn't want my kids watching two adults going at it like that. BUT, have a man and a woman just walking naked through the mall, doing nothing sexual, just being nude... that's fine by me.
These paintings and sculptures are of the naked form, not of gratuitous sexual acts.
Pixelating the art in the news story... blooooodyyyy hell.
>> ^deedub81:
Nice try. I'm sorry to inform you that your opinion does not matter because your comment has too many spelling and grammatical errors.
>> ^westy:
well [insert coma here] i see nothing wrong with nudity evan sex for kids to look at as its perfectly human and normal . but [began the sentence with a lower case "B" and a conjunction] if you [Insert "are"] going to make it [Poor sentence structure. Specify subject "it"] 18+ to see people having sex ore to look at porn then it folows that same should aply to art that depicts the same things, it [What is it?] only servs to highlight the obserdity of the law and how stupid hamans can be
[Long run-on sentence with improper punctuation]
I don't remember off hand who did the study/survey but there was a group that went to numerous major museums in the New York area to take a tally of how many women were represented in art in museums. They then counted how many of these women were nude or partly so. As I remember the vast majority were naked. I think it was the Guerrilla Girls but I'm not certain.
Whomever is leading this "fight against obscenity" conservative or not, they have no respect for art and a complete misunderstanding of what free speech really entails.
That being said, you can take anything and turn it into filth.
Washington monument is a giant erect penis. The liberty bell is a big condom with a little rip. The lady justice of the supreme court suggests S & M, etc etc.
thanks for taking the time to spell check my writing.
................................................................
>>Nice try. I'm sorry to inform you that your opinion does not matter because your comment has too many spelling and grammatical errors.
>>
well [insert coma here] i see nothing wrong with nudity evan sex for kids to look at as its perfectly human and normal . but [began the sentence with a lower case "B" and a conjunction] if you [Insert "are"] going to make it [Poor sentence structure. Specify subject "it"] 18+ to see people having sex ore to look at porn then it folows that same should aply to art that depicts the same things, it [What is it?] only servs to highlight the obserdity of the law and how stupid hamans can be
[Long run-on sentence with improper punctuation]
You can legislate morality. Most laws are derived from a subset of morality. However many people have such a backwards definition of morality that it becomes convenient to separate the two.
Morality, like a just system of laws, is a code of conduct whose adherence tends to promote the common good and prevent people from harming each other, without any superfluous infringement on the freedom of individuals nor asymmetry among the rights of people. Good legal systems are enforceable subsets of such moral imperatives, plus accessories to their implementation such as the collection of taxes, and public works whose service to the common good goes above and beyond any moral imperative.
God, I hate people!
Don't snitch us out to God, you know how he deals with this type of shit.
After that, we'll be bringing in a plan to lop off every dick and tit, and concrete over the vag for all humanity to ensure such filth can never ever hurt the children again...
Seriously, these wankers legislating morality shouldn't be allowed to breed. That way they'll never accidentally endanger their children...
>> ^Sketch:
God, I hate people!
Don't snitch us out to God, you know how he deals with this type of shit.
It's just a turn of phrase. There is no god.
They're not legislating morality, they're legislating bronze age myths that have dubiously been labeled as morality.
Nice try. I'm sorry to inform you that your opinion does not matter because your comment has too many spelling and grammatical errors.
>> ^westy:
well [insert coma here] i see nothing wrong with nudity evan sex for kids to look at as its perfectly human and normal . but [began the sentence with a lower case "B" and a conjunction] if you [Insert "are"] going to make it [Poor sentence structure. Specify subject "it"] 18+ to see people having sex ore to look at porn then it folows that same should aply to art that depicts the same things, it [What is it?] only servs to highlight the obserdity of the law and how stupid hamans can be
[Long run-on sentence with improper punctuation]
who cares...this is not website to look for grammatical errors.
I'm tired of this non sense crap..
I remember a kindergarden teachers comment about field trips to the museum - the tykes will oggle the appendages of a Venus or David for a few seconds then move on to the far more interesting dinosaur exhibit.